Charles De Geer

Charles De Geer bigraphy, stories - Zoologists

Charles De Geer : biography

20 January 1720 – 7 March 1778

Baron Charles de Geer (the family is usually known as De Geer with a capitalized "De"; Finspång in Risinge 30 January 1720 – Stockholm 7 March 1778) was a Swedish industrialist and entomologist.


De Geer, who came from a family with strong Dutch connections, grew up in Utrecht from the age of three but returned to Sweden as a young man. He inherited the entailed manor and important iron-works of Leufsta (Lövsta) in Uppland from his childless uncle and namesake and substantially increased the wealth of the estate.

Ever since he had received a present of some silk worms at the age of eight, he had an interest in entomology and became a respected amateur entomologist at an early age. His major work was the Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des insectes (eight volumes, 1752-1778). He was elected a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences already in 1739, at the age of nineteen, and a corresponding member of the French Academy of Sciences in 1748.

He is buried with his spouse in Uppsala Cathedral. His collections of insects were donated to the Academy of Sciences and now belong to the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm. He left a library at Leufsta which, among other things, included the papers of Olaus Rudbeck and an important collection of 18th century sheet music. The Leufsta library was acquired by Uppsala University Library in 1986 after a donation by Katarina Crafoord (one of the daughters of Holger Crafoord, the founder of Gambro).

References and further research

  • Duncan, James (1804-1861): Introduction to entomology. Lizars, Edinburgh 1840.
  • Pont, A.C. (1996) : Some reflections on the history of systematic Dipterology. Dipterists Digest, Series 2, 2: 49-70.
  • Degeer’s insect collection, without the original labels and not in the original cabinet may be found at the Swedish Museum of Natural History.

Common insects described by De Geer

  • Camponotus pennsylvanicus, the black carpenter ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
  • Dermestes maculatus, a Skin beetle, Coleoptera 1774
  • Xestobium rufovillosum, the Death watch beetle, Coleoptera 1774
  • Meconema thalassinum, Oak bush-cricket, Orthoptera 1773
  • Gasterophilus intestinalis, Horse Botfly, Diptera 1776
  • Episyrphus balteatus, a Hoverfly, Diptera 1776
  • Triatoma rubrofasciata, Triatominae, Hemiptera 1773
  • Erythrodiplax unimaculata, a Dragonfly 1773
  • Anasa tristis, Squash bug


  • Tal om nyttan, som Insecterne och deras skärskådande, tilskynda oss, … Stockholm 1744-47.
  • Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des insectes. Grefing & Hesselberg, Stockholm 1752-78.
  • Tal, om insecternas alstring. Stockholm 1754.
  • Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Insecten. Müller & Raspe, Leipzig, Nürnberg 1776-83 p.m.
  • Genera et species insectorum. Crusium, Leipzig 1783 p.m.


De Geer was a great admirer of Réaumur. Hence his modelling Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des insectes on Réaumur’s work of the same title. It, too, is in French, similarly in large quarto and with the same decorations. The Mémoires deal with 1,466 species, treating life histories, food and reproduction based on careful, patient investigation and analysis of existing literature. There are 238 copper plates. The descriptions are acutely observed.

In nomenclature De Geer was less progressive; Volume 1 of the Mémoires (1752) was too early to employ the binomial system invented by his fellow Swede Linnaeus. Volume 2 (1771) did not use it, but in Volumes 3 (1773) to Volume 7 (1778) the Linnean system was employed.]s established by De Geer, provided by AnimalBase] However, for many species De Geer used two or more words for a specific name, such as Aphis betulae nigro punctata,Used for a species in volume 3, p. 45. these names were not binomial in the Linnean sense. He also proposed different names for many species which had previously been named and described by Linnaeus. It seems that using Linnean names was a concession to usage as in the 1760s and 1770s the Linnean system became increasingly employed, not because De Geer liked the new system. They had differences "not everyone sees things in the same light, and people have the weakness of frequently being too fond of their own opinions" (letter to Linnaeus 16 October 1772) and "if here and there I am still of a different opinion, I am now, as before, asking you not to take it amiss" (letter to Linnaeus 23 February 1774).