Robert of Melun

39
Robert of Melun bigraphy, stories - Bishop of Hereford; Theologian

Robert of Melun : biography

– 27 February 1167

Robert of Melun (c. 1100 – 27 February 1167) was an English scholastic Christian theologian who taught in France, and later became Bishop of Hereford in England. He studied under Peter Abelard in Paris before teaching there and at Melun, which gave him his surname. His students included John of Salisbury, Roger of Worcester, William of Tyre, and possibly Thomas Becket. Robert was involved in the Council of Reims in 1148, which condemned the teachings of Gilbert de la Porrée. Three of his theological works survive, and show him to have been strictly orthodox.

Robert returned to England in 1160, and was appointed Bishop of Hereford in 1163. King Henry II of England appointed him to the see, or bishopric, and was influenced by in his decision by Pope Alexander II and Thomas Becket. Following his consecration, Robert became involved in the dispute between Becket and the king, during which he generally took the king’s side. He also served as a papal and a royal judge.

Citations

Role in the Becket dispute

In 1163, a conflict arose between the king and the new Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, over the rights of the king in the English church. At a council held at Westminster in October 1163, the king and Becket contended over the question, with the bishops supporting Becket against the king.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 95–96 Robert was involved in the conflict not only as a bishop-elect, but as an envoy to Becket from the pope, as he accompanied Philip of Aumone, a French abbot, who was sent by Alexander to Becket in after the Council of Westminster to urge Becket not to inflame the situation. Robert went with Philip, probably because it was hoped he would be able to influence Becket.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 97–98

Robert was present in January 1164 when the king summoned a council of the barons and the bishops to Clarendon, where the king demanded that both groups swear to uphold the royal rights of Henry’s grandfather, King Henry I, without any reservations or conditions. Although Becket at first attempted to resist, he eventually submitted, and then forced the other bishops to swear also.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 98–99 In October 1164, Becket was accused of denying justice to a royal vassal, tried at a council held at Northampton,Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 108–109 and was found guilty although he did not accept the sentence.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 113–114 During the trial, Robert attempted to moderate Becket’s behaviour, by persuading him from having his archiepiscopal cross, a symbol of spiritual authority, carried in front of him when he entered the court, which would have been an insult to the king. Shortly after the trial, Robert interceded with the king to order that no injury be done to Becket, who went into voluntary exile.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 115–116

Early in Becket’s exile, Robert received a papal censure for not doing more to support Becket.Barlow Thomas Becket p. 135 In summer 1165, Robert accompanied Gilbert Foliot, the Bishop of London, on a papal mission to King Henry, to convey to the king Pope Alexander’s complaints about the king’s behaviour. The king had been preventing his subjects from visiting or appealing to the papacy, and Alexander wished to protest against that, as well as against the king’s treatment of Becket.Barlow Thomas Becket p. 137 In 1166, Becket tried to convince Robert to switch sides, writing to Robert in conciliatory tones. John of Salisbury, a supporter of Becket’s, prevailed upon two French academics to write to Robert, criticising him for hypocrisy.Barlow Thomas Becket pp. 151–152

In October 1166, Becket ordered Robert and Roger of Worcester to attend him in France, so they could give him guidance on his dispute with the king. When they informed the king of their intended journey he forbade them to leave England. Nevertheless they attempted to sneak out of the country in February 1167. They were apprehended on 2 February, and ordered to remain in England not only in the king’s name, but also in Alexander’s.Barlow Thomas Becket p. 160